Boeing: Regulator admits ‘mistake’ over aircraft crashes

December 11, 2019 by No Comments

[ad_1]

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator Stephen DicksonImage copyright
AFP/Getty

Image caption

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator Stephen Dickson

US safety regulators examining the first deadly Boeing 737 Max crash saw a high chance of future accidents if the company did not make changes.

Analysts predicted more than a dozen crashes could occur – or roughly one every two or three years.

Despite this, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) did not ground the aircraft until after a second crash five months later.

FAA chief Steve Dickson said the agency had made a mistake in its oversight.

The FAA risk assessment was revealed during a congressional hearing on Wednesday. Lawmakers are investigating Boeing following fatal 737 Max crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia, which together killed 346 people.

Officials have identified an automated control system in the 737 Max 8, known as MCAS, as a factor in both accidents.

Boeing has said the system, which relied on a single sensor, received erroneous data, which led it to override pilot commands and push the aircraft downwards.

  • What went wrong in Boeing’s cockpit?

The FAA’s investigation of the October Indonesia crash called for Boeing to redesign its system, warning of a risk of more than a dozen crashes over the 45-year lifetime of the roughly 4,800 737 Max planes in service.

Regulators also issued an alert to airlines, but the agency did not ground the aircraft until after the 10 March Ethiopia crash, several days after action by other countries.

“Was a mistake made?” asked Democrat congressman Henry Johnson.

“Obviously the result was not satisfactory,” said Mr Dickson, who was put in charge of the FAA in the summer, after the accidents.

In response to later questions, he admitted the agency had made a mistake at some point in the process.

‘Grave concerns’

Boeing is revising the MCAS software, but lawmakers say their investigation has shown that the aircraft manufacturer was aware of flaws in the system.

Boeing staff have also raised concerns that the company was prioritising speed over safety at the factory that produced Max 737s, contributing to the crashes.

Ed Pierson, a former senior manager at the factory, told Congress he repeatedly warned Boeing’s leadership of the safety risks caused by what he described as a “factory in chaos”, but it had little effect.

He also said that, after the crashes, US government regulators have shown little interest in his concerns.

“I remain gravely concerned that… that the flying public will remain at risk unless this unstable production environment is rigorously investigated and closely monitored by regulators on an ongoing basis,” he said in prepared testimony.

Mr Dickson said the FAA is probing production issues. He also said he is considering further actions against Boeing.

In a statement, Boeing said Mr Pierson’s own account showed the company took his concerns seriously.

“Company executives and senior leaders on the 737 program were made aware of Mr. Pierson’s concerns, discussed them in detail, and took appropriate steps to assess them,” it said.

[ad_2]